Litigation Daily
Litigation Daily is an online patent lawsuit database that collects details on the latest US patent litigation cases. Critical information includes the prosecution and post-proceedings history, possible validity issues, and the potential prior art of the patents involved in US district court, ITC, and PTAB cases. Spot potential opportunities by simply performing a patent lawsuit search.
For more specific search results, please select your desired court and case filing dates:
Duration:
Jurisdiction:
9 new cases in District Court, 0 in PTAB, and 0 in ITC.
60 new cases in District Court, 24 in PTAB, and 0 in ITC.
There are no cases filed today. Clickto find cases filed in last 7 days.
PATENTS WITH QUALITY ISSUES 71 % 185 Applications
71% COMPOSITION
Quantity of Applications

To Access more patent data, simply click the button below!

VIEW PLAN
Expand all to the insights of asserted patents
Filing Date
Plaintiff (# of Patents Owned)
Defendant (# of Patents Owned)
Court / Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-07-22
GENTEX CORP (6,040)
INDIGO TECHNOLOGIES LLC (0)
FACEBOOK INC (22,007)
FACEBOOK TECHNOLOGIES LLC (4,341)
Western District of Texas
6-21-cv-00755
5
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
6757068
0 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
0 Refs
0 Refs
7301648
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
35 U.S.C.§ 101
35 U.S.C.§ 103
Double Patenting
0 Refs
2 Refs
8224024
1 Non Final
1 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
35 U.S.C.§ 101
35 U.S.C.§ 112
35 U.S.C.§ 102
35 U.S.C.§ 103
1 Refs
4 Refs
6922632
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
35 U.S.C.§ 112
35 U.S.C.§ 103
0 Refs
1 Refs
7725253
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
35 U.S.C.§ 112
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
Filing Date
Plaintiff (# of Patents Owned)
Defendant (# of Patents Owned)
Court / Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-07-22
CAUSAM ENTERPRISES INC (224)
XYLES INC (0)
Western District of Texas
6-21-cv-00752
4
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
9678522
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
10394268
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
10396592
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
8805552
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
Filing Date
Plaintiff (# of Patents Owned)
Defendant (# of Patents Owned)
Court / Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-07-22
JEZIGN LICENSING LLC (3)
BEBE STORES INC (0)
ZIGI US LLC (0)
District of Maryland
8-21-cv-01821
1
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
D554848
Quality Insights supports US utility patents only
Filing Date
Plaintiff (# of Patents Owned)
Defendant (# of Patents Owned)
Court / Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-07-22
BRIAN KERN (1)
DYLAN KERN (1)
A1 CYCLES INC (0)
MIKE BELAND (0)
M3-MAD MONKEY MORTORSPORTS LLC (0)
BRANDON WHITE (0)
CYNTHIA WHITE (0)
Eastern District of Michigan
2-21-cv-11703
1
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
D902834
Quality Insights supports US utility patents only
Filing Date
Plaintiff (# of Patents Owned)
Defendant (# of Patents Owned)
Court / Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-07-22
CAUSAM ENTERPRISES INC (224)
ECOBEE INC (193)
Western District of Texas
6-21-cv-00748
4
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
9678522
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
10394268
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
10396592
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
8805552
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
Filing Date
Plaintiff (# of Patents Owned)
Defendant (# of Patents Owned)
Court / Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-07-22
CAUSAM ENTERPRISES INC (224)
RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES INC (0)
Western District of Texas
6-21-cv-00749
4
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
9678522
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
10394268
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
10396592
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
8805552
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
Filing Date
Plaintiff (# of Patents Owned)
Defendant (# of Patents Owned)
Court / Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-07-22
CAUSAM ENTERPRISES INC (224)
ITRON INC (2,177)
Western District of Texas
6-21-cv-00750
4
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
9678522
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
10394268
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
10396592
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
8805552
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
Filing Date
Plaintiff (# of Patents Owned)
Defendant (# of Patents Owned)
Court / Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-07-22
BAYER PHARMA AG (9,593)
BAYER AG (215,830)
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA NV (41,375)
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC (202)
MYLAN INC (485)
Northern District of West Virginia
1-21-cv-00099
1
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
10828310
2 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
35 U.S.C.§ 112
35 U.S.C.§ 102
35 U.S.C.§ 103
0 Refs
1 Refs
Filing Date
Plaintiff (# of Patents Owned)
Defendant (# of Patents Owned)
Court / Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-07-22
CAUSAM ENTERPRISES INC (224)
ALARMCOM INC (717)
Western District of Texas
6-21-cv-00751
4
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
9678522
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
10394268
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
10396592
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
8805552
1 Non Final
0 Final
0 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
Double Patenting
0 Refs
0 Refs
Filing Date
Plaintiff (# of Patents Owned)
Defendant (# of Patents Owned)
Court / Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-07-21
PIXEL DISPLAY LLC (2)
ELEMENT ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS LLC (0)
District of Delaware
1-21-cv-01055
1
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
7245343
7 Non Final
1 Final
1 RCE
0 PTAB
0 Reexam
35 U.S.C.§ 102
35 U.S.C.§ 103
1 Refs
6 Refs
1

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Client Relationship Building and Business Opportunity Management

Attorneys can keep-up-to-date with recent patent cases, quickly grasp the current litigation market situation, and respond to any client issues immediately. Additionally, Litigation Daily helps attorneys to provide suitable professional services and support to their clients accordingly.

2. Foresee Litigation Issues

Stay ahead of the game and exercise caution when dealing with the litigation market with recent patent cases. Litigation Daily can be used to foresee any future litigation issues that may affect your business, thus allowing you to stay prepared at all times.

The number of patents listed for each plaintiff, defendant, patent owner, and petitioner is calculated by the total number of patents that this particular current assignee has obtained. This information is gathered using Patentcloud’s powerful database.

When there is no visible ITC data, it means that there are no recently filed ITC cases to look into.

Litigation Daily provides the number of patents owned by the named specific assignee only, the data does not include any related affiliates. As for the number of patents from the Patent Search results, this number is calculated with the standardized assignee, which includes all names of the specific assignee.

Sign up to Patent Search to uncover all of the patent data for related affiliates.

We only displayed the patent number of that particular assignee; therefore, if the assignee has other names, the data will not be captured.

When the number of patents owned is displayed as 0, it may indicate:

  • The plaintiff is not the patent owner, but has the exclusive licensing authority.
  • The patent assignment data has not yet being registered at USPTO

Why are some file wrapper data not available?

  • We only provide data that can be retrieved online, which are the patents granted after 2003. Therefore, the specific patent you are looking into may have been granted before 2003.
  • The patent at issue may simply have no rejections.

Get started with Patentcloud today

Discover how Patentcloud’s solutions and tools can work for you.

Start now